Domestic Spacial Turbulence

31 Responses to “Domestic Spacial Turbulence”

1. On April 24th, 2007 at 18:58, artemskiy said:

   thank you! impressive!
2. On May 6th, 2007 at 08:35, hey said:

   cool
3. On May 27th, 2007 at 01:04, Carl Helsing said:

   I had 3 idea’s as to how the action accomplished.The first was that of pure graphic motion mechanic’s.The second was the mean’s described using miniature object’s in something of a room type enclosure.The third was with the room static and a magnetic drum rotating around the miniature space,and each of the object’s having magnetizeable material embedded in them.Other degree’s of video separation seem pplicable.
4. On May 27th, 2007 at 16:08, c01Dcu7 said:

   cool but i think you succeeded in breaking everything 0_o

   i love your work

   keep it up
5. On June 22nd, 2007 at 22:12, DJ said:

   Your work is amazing and creative. It’s really great. I’ve checked out only four of your projects thus far — living fast, live free or die,matchbook sign language, and this spinning house with doll furniture inside.

   your attention to detail and originality of thinking are nothing short of phenomenal, and coming from me, that’s a lot. I’m a pretty damn original person.

   Thank you for making this world a more awesome and creative place to be in through your awesomely insane and well executed projects.

   (hey it would not let me type in thirteen)

   DJ
6. On June 30th, 2007 at 17:02, Dalia said:

   Hi,
   It would be more funny if you add small dolls ^^
   • On August 21st, 2007 at 01:16, JK said:

     not everything is funny.
     • On January 7th, 2009 at 06:26, Jason said:

       Well, I contend that also, not everything is serious. This project I did like, and you as the artist obviously control said project, but from another point of view, the kind of odd morbidity of containing small humans is also interesting and darkly “funny.” Granted not everyone feels that way, but isn’t that kind of art?
7. On August 20th, 2007 at 12:49, roo said:

   hahaha, it was good
8. On August 23rd, 2007 at 15:17, BurnMaker said:

   hahahah i laughed my ass of.. awesome! lol
9. On September 13th, 2007 at 19:23, Scott said:

   On spam protection: What if someone didn’t know how to add?

   On the sound: Listening to the video for that long made it start to sound like music, kinda like african drums with a high bpm.
   • On September 23rd, 2007 at 18:22, JK said:

     On spam protection: If someone is not able to add single digit numbers, s/he should not be allowed to use the internet.

     On the sound: I’m amazed you made it long enough for that to happen. Most people find it a quick annoyance.
     • On October 3rd, 2007 at 20:55, JK said:

       This reply makes no sense now that I’m using a WordPress plug-in to manage my comment spam.
10. On October 6th, 2007 at 15:28, Brad O'Farrell said:

    Hmmm! Watching that video gave me a cool idea. One of the ‘problems’ (I hate to phrase it that way, it’s not really a problem, but it’s something that could be changed to take it in a different direction) with this structure is that the furniture seemed to get caught in a loop, but I think if you added a second axis the churning would be more chaotic and visually interesting. And I guess as a practical application it’d be cool for a music video or something, if you replaced the window with a solid color and the chroma-keyed in a background, and then maybe super imposed people to be standing inside the room amongst the flying furniture, it’d create a cool effect.
    • On October 15th, 2007 at 21:51, JK said:

      All valid suggestions if I am able to return to this project and make another version. I will say that the furniture getting caught in a loop was part of the effect I was going for. It was supposed to be monotonous and almost pathetic.
11. On October 8th, 2007 at 04:38, Miss M said:

    I would like to take you for tea
    • On October 15th, 2007 at 21:51, JK said:

      Maybe the next time I’m in town.
12. On November 8th, 2007 at 18:09, Jena said:

    Once you wish to be natural…you become common.

    This was in fact pathetic…in attempting to be unique. Try harder.
13. On November 14th, 2007 at 08:20, Elena said:

    This reminded me of Waiting for Godot. Probably because of the monotony and degeneration.
14. On January 19th, 2008 at 02:18, max said:

    Did you try it without the window?
    • On January 21st, 2008 at 11:27, JK said:

      No, I did not try this without the window.
15. On January 19th, 2008 at 02:21, max said:

    (I really like it)
16. On September 22nd, 2008 at 20:33, max said:

    I still like it, today!
17. On December 20th, 2008 at 18:54, chris said:

    Heard you were at mcmurdo.

    Cheers, and happy holidays.
18. On January 5th, 2009 at 19:54, Alan said:

    crank dat domestic spacial turbulence
19. On February 20th, 2009 at 17:03, Celia said:

    I think this would look even more interesting if there wasn’t a window, because I found that being able to see something turning behind the window slightly detracted from the effect of the whole thing for me.
20. On June 21st, 2009 at 22:47, Lisa Loo said:

    Greetings from Glasgow.

    Love this. It gave me the impression that the furniture was possessed or something. I like the presence of the window. Found it cute. Although I find myself focussing on it for a short periods which led me to feel quite dizzy.
21. On August 11th, 2009 at 00:59, Rainy Day said:

    that clock is pretty stoic
22. capoluiz (Capo Luiz) tweetback on October 5th, 2009 at 15:21
23. On October 9th, 2009 at 15:33, Aniruddha B said:

    Its look amazing

    I think you have feet the camera inside the house model.when it is spinning, camera also spinning with house model and cause of spinning with house it is giving experience to viewer like the inside view of house is steal with camera frame but other elements are spining with extrem motion and you have used elements like intereior of house so its look like illusion .

    really nice.
24. _ SIMON MARXEN _ » _Domestic Spacial Turbulence pingback on November 24th, 2009 at 10:31

This is an archived page. Comments are sealed. I can't take the criticism.